Legal Opinion

Germansen v. Egan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1937No. Appeal, 142PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This is an action of trespass brought by the plaintiff against the landlord of her employer. The verdict was for the plaintiff, so all disputed questions of fact must be resolved in her favor. In the light of “that principle we shall state the relevant facts.

The defendant, Mrs. Josephine Egan, was the owner of a four story building fronting on Walnut Street, Philadelphia. She rented part of the first floor to Sherman-Linderman Company, for whom the plaintiff worked as a millinery designer. The premises leased to the Sherman-Linderman Company included a store room…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harris (Et Ux.) v. Lewistown Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Bruder v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Lewin v. PauliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Sloan v. HirschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Baxter v. Borough of HomesteadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lopez v. GukenbackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Ephraim Dabush v. Seacret Direct LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Williams v. WolfSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Adler v. SklaroffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Portee v. KronzekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API