Legal Opinion
ResQNet. Com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 5, 2010No. 2008-1365, 2008-1366, 2009-1030PublishedCited by 156 opinions
1Per curiam
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that U.S. Patent No. 6,295,075 (the '075 patent), owned by ResQNet.com, Inc., is valid and is infringed by Lansa, Inc. The district court also ruled that ResQNet’s U.S. Patent No. 5,831,608 (the '608 patent) is not infringed. The court awarded damages of $506,305 for past infringement based on a hypothetical royalty of 12.5%, plus prejudgment interest. The court denied ResQNet’s motion for a permanent injunction, and imposed a license, at a royalty of 12.5%, for future activity covered by the '075 patent. The court…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Perpetual Securities, Inc. v. Julie Tang and Hua Yu ChenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by156 opinions
- Laserdynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Finjan, Inc. v. Secure Computing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Virnetx, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.