Legal Opinion
Kimple v. Conway
California Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1886No. 9700PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco granting a nonsuit, and from an order dissolving a preliminary injunction, and from an order refusing a new trial Motion to dismiss appeal The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Motion to dismiss appeals taken by the plaintiff. The notice of appeal is as follows:—
“You will please take notice that the plaintiff in the above-entitled action hereby appeals to the Supreme Court of the state of California, from the judgment or order of nonsuit in the above-entitled cause, also order dissolving preliminary injunction in said 'cause therein entered in the said Superior Court on the eighth day of *72February, 1884, in favor of the defendants in said action and against said plaintiff, and from the whole thereof.
“ Also overruling and denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McLaughlin v. DohertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by21 opinions
- Costa v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Banfield v. SchuldermanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re SalazarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Durant v. ComegysIdaho Supreme Court · 1891
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.