Legal Opinion

Glidden v. Packard

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1865PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County, of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Sawyer, J.

This is an appeal from an order subsequent to judgment on default, “that the defendant have leave to file his answer” to the merits. The only papers brought up in the transcript were the judgment in the case; the order appealed from allowing defendant to answer; the notice of motion for the order ; and the proposed answer. A diminution of the record having been suggested by respondent, and the papers said to be omitted having been ordered to be certified to this Court, a full transcript of the judgment roll and the proceedings on attachment has been filed. The appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stearus v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. McCarthy v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Steinbach v. LeeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Farrar v. SteenberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Belknap v. CharltonOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Reinhart v. LugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Willson v. CleavelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Bond v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API