Legal Opinion

Speer v. Donfeld

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 19, 1998No. 2 CA-SA 98-0040PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioners challenge the respondent judge’s order revoking petitioner James A. Coulter’s admission pro hac vice as counsel for petitioner Theresa Speer in her underlying medical malpractice action. Petitioners appealed the order, but we determined that this court lacked appellate jurisdiction under A.R.S. § 12-2101. Thus, we dismissed the appeal and, in our discretion, redesignated the case as a special action filed pursuant to Rule 4, Ariz.R.P.Spec.Action, 17B A.R.S. Because petitioners have no remedy by appeal and because Speer is substantially affected by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sadler v. Arizona Flour Mills Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Mayo v. EphromArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Sisk v. BallArizona Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Ace American Insurance v. Underwriters at Lloyds & CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Filppula-McArthur v. HalloinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. GRAND v. NACCHIO McMASTER And QWEST COMMUNICATIONSCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. McIver v. RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API