Mayo v. Ephrom
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs below from an order granting defendants a new trial. Defendants, Harry G. Ephrom and Dorothy M. Ephrom, husband and wife, and Jack M. Rayner and D. Fay Rayner, husband and wife, cross-appealed from the effect of said order as denying their motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict by operation of law.
The complaint alleged fraud was perpetrated by defendants in the sale of a 320-acre farm to plaintiffs near Maricopa, Pinal County, Arizona. The purchase price of $80,000 was to be paid as follows: $11,000 in cash, an assignment of a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stewart v. Phoenix National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Stallcup v. RathbunArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Pioneer Constructors v. SymesArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Sadler v. Arizona Flour Mills Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Pima County v. BilbyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Suciu v. AMFAC Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Saide v. StantonArizona Supreme Court · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.