Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Ephrom

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1958No. 6320PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs below from an order granting defendants a new trial. Defendants, Harry G. Ephrom and Dorothy M. Ephrom, husband and wife, and Jack M. Rayner and D. Fay Rayner, husband and wife, cross-appealed from the effect of said order as denying their motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict by operation of law.

The complaint alleged fraud was perpetrated by defendants in the sale of a 320-acre farm to plaintiffs near Maricopa, Pinal County, Arizona. The purchase price of $80,000 was to be paid as follows: $11,000 in cash, an assignment of a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Phoenix National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Stallcup v. RathbunArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Pioneer Constructors v. SymesArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Sadler v. Arizona Flour Mills Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. Pima County v. BilbyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Suciu v. AMFAC Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Saide v. StantonArizona Supreme Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API