Ace American Insurance v. Underwriters at Lloyds & Companies
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
DANIELS, J.:
BACKGROUND OF CASE
¶ 1 The facts and procedural history pertinent to each of these consolidated appeals will be hereinafter addressed fully, but the underlying litigation is between ACE American Insurance Company (“ACE”), a commercial insurer, and its Errors and Omissions (“E & O”) insurers, Columbia Casualty Company (“Columbia”) and Universal Underwriters at Lloyds and Companies (“Lloyds”). The dispute arose out of a claim reported by ACE to Columbia and Lloyds, under its E & 0 policy; Columbia and Lloyds denied ACE’s claim as untimely noticed to them. Because of this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- K.H. v. J.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Kelly, R. v. The Carman Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Commonwealth v. BellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Marion, D. v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Saint Luke's Hospital of Bethlehem v. VivianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Avery, A. v. Cercone, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.