Legal Opinion

Ace American Insurance v. Underwriters at Lloyds & Companies

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 2007PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DANIELS, J.:

BACKGROUND OF CASE

¶ 1 The facts and procedural history pertinent to each of these consolidated appeals will be hereinafter addressed fully, but the underlying litigation is between ACE American Insurance Company (“ACE”), a commercial insurer, and its Errors and Omissions (“E & O”) insurers, Columbia Casualty Company (“Columbia”) and Universal Underwriters at Lloyds and Companies (“Lloyds”). The dispute arose out of a claim reported by ACE to Columbia and Lloyds, under its E & 0 policy; Columbia and Lloyds denied ACE’s claim as untimely noticed to them. Because of this…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. K.H. v. J.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Kelly, R. v. The Carman Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Commonwealth v. BellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Marion, D. v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Saint Luke's Hospital of Bethlehem v. VivianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Avery, A. v. Cercone, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API