Landsberg v. San Francisco & P. S. S. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon; Robert S. Bean, Judge. Action at law by Chriss Eandsberg against the San Francisco & Portland Steamship Company. Judgment for defendant on directed verdict, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries. At the close of the testimony on the part of the plaintiff, the court below directed a verdict in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff brings error.
At the threshold of the case we are met with the objection that no exception was taken or reserved to the charge of the court, and there is therefore no question before us for review. That this is the general rule does not admit of question. Lindsay v. Burgess, 156 U. S. 208, 15 Sup. Ct. 355, 39 L. Ed. 399; Smith v. Hopkins, 120 Fed. 921, 57 C. C. A. 193;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bilboa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Smith v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
- Mexico International Land Co. v. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Lindsay v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Gould & Curry Mining Co. v. DouglassCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- McCuing v. BovayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Brown v. CarverCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Vance v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Howland v. BeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.