Legal Opinion
Pope v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 28, 1923No. 2974PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOEEEY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error (defendants below) were tried and convicted on five counts of an indictment charging them with the possession and sale of liquor in violation of the National Prohibition Act, 41 Stat. 305, and with conspiracies, first, to sell liquor in violation of the National Prohibition Act and, second, to defraud the United States in violation of sections 600a, 604, 620 of title 6, chapter 18 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 5986e, 5986j, 6114/).
The record brought here by this writ of error is unusual in that of the twelve…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Minner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- State v. La FeraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Beard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1946
- Ong Way Jong, Alias Johnny Ong, and Wee Zee Yep v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.