Legal Opinion
Bilboa v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1923No. 3947PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAN, District Judge.
The defendants were charged jointly with a violation of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305) in three counts: (1) Unlawfully and knowingly having in their possession intoxicating liquors; (2) making a sale thereof; and (3) maintaining a nuisance. The defendant Bilboa was convicted on the charge of possession and sale, and Borda of a sale. Both defendants were acquitted on the nuisance charge. From the judgments which followed, they have appealed.
The only point argued here is the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. No such question was raised in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Haywood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
- Robinson & Co. v. BeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Rich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Carrignan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
- Gozner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- James Melvin Lucas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.