Legal Opinion
Wolf v. Columbia School District No. 400
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 19, 1997No. 15415-7-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, J.
Galen Wolf appeals a jury verdict holding he was properly discharged, contending the trial court erred in its jury instruction and in excluding certain evidence. We affirm.
FACTS
The parties do not dispute the basic facts. Galen Wolf was employed as a custodian and maintenance worker by Columbia School District Number 400 (the District) from Spring 1992 until his discharge in May 1994. As a custodian, Mr. Wolf was classified as an "uncertificated employee.”
In January 1994, the District adopted Policy Number 4315 (the Policy) prohibiting the possession of dangerous weapons on school grounds. Mr.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Clarke v. Shoreline School District No. 412Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Estate of Ryder v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- George v. Parke-DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Herring v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ruchert v. Freeman School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Ruchert v. Freeman School Dist.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Woodall v. Freeman School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Woodall v. Freeman School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006