Legal Opinion

Estate of Ryder v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1978No. 45197PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

In this product liability case, certified here by the Court of Appeals, judgment for defendants, Aluminum Company of America (Alcoa) and Kelly-Springfield Tire Company, was entered on a jury verdict following a 12-day trial. Appellant Ryder defines the issue on appeal to be the applicability of the concept of foreseeability in a product strict liability case and she assigns as error the instruction of the jury by the trial court. No other complaint is made concerning the conduct of the trial. We conclude that the trial court's instructions, though not ultimate models for a case of this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Teagle v. Fischer & Porter Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Nelson v. MuellerWashington Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Baughn v. Honda Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Ray Ex Rel. Holman v. BIC Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API