Legal Opinion

State v. Minamyer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1967No. 40892PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

In this case, the appellant had filed charges against two persons for allegedly stealing his automobile. Those persons, when apprehended, confessed to having committed acts of sodomy with the appellant on the night the alleged car theft *68occurred. All three were accused of sodomy, but the sodomy charges against the alleged car thieves were never pressed.

The basic and dispositive question raised by this appeal is whether the prosecuting attorney during the trial of an accused may testify or comment upon the fact that an accused refused to testify before the grand jury in relation to charges…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Stevens v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Hebebrand v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. HarmonOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. StephensOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. WigglesworthOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. TomrdleNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API