Legal Opinion

State v. Wigglesworth

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1969No. 68-382PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

Defendant complains because he was given no preliminary hearing pursuant to Section 2937.01 et seq., Devised Code.

After being charged with first degree murder, defendant was brought before the Akron Municipal Court on June 3, 1967 for arraignment. Because defendant was not represented by counsel, the court, pursuant to Section 2937.03, Revised Code, continued the case until June 9, 1967. In the meantime, on June 8, the grand jury of Summit County indicted defendant for first degree murder. Thereafter, on July 6, 1967 defendant filed a motion to remand the cause to the Municipal Court for a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Gray v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Davis v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Tezeno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API