Legal Opinion
State v. Morris
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1975No. Nos. 74-81 and 74-94PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
In ease Nos. 74-81 and 74-94, appellants Morris and MeSpadden, respectively, cite as error the admission in evidence at trial of certain narcotics which, they allege, were obtained in violation of the restrictions of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures.
In case No. 74-81, appellant Morris also maintains that the verdicts returned by the jury in the trial of the codefendants on the first count of the indictment are inconsistent and repugnant and must be set aside. Appellant Morris also contends that the procedure whereby the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. GrantOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Joseph Riley v. Frank H. Gray, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- State v. BlevinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. JesterOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. CooperOhio Supreme Court · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.