Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1998No. 66040-9PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

A trial court accepted Tony Lemar Smith’s plea of guilty to cocaine possession even though defense counsel expressed a mistaken belief that Smith could appeal a suppression ruling after pleading guilty. The Court of Appeals held that defense counsel’s mistaken statement did not overcome the evidence that Smith entered the plea knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently, and dismissed Smith’s appeal without reaching the merits. We reverse and remand to the trial court to permit Smith to withdraw his plea in favor of a trial on stipulated facts.

FACTS

Two bicycle patrol officers who knew Smith…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. S.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. State v. EasterlinWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. In Re Personal Restraint Petition of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API