Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1998No. 66040-9PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
953 P.2d 810 (1998)
134 Wash.2d 849
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Tony Lemar SMITH, Petitioner.
No. 66040-9.
Supreme Court of Washington.
April 9, 1998.
Shannon Marsh, Seattle, for Petitioner.
Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, Erin Riley, Deputy, Seattle, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
A trial court accepted Tony Lemar Smith's plea of guilty to cocaine possession even though defense counsel expressed a mistaken belief that Smith could appeal a suppression ruling after pleading guilty. The Court of Appeals held that defense counsel's mistaken statement did not overcome the evidence that Smith entered the plea…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by26 opinions
- State v. S.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. EasterlinWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- In re the Personal Restraint of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- In Re Personal Restraint Petition of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. NeffWashington Supreme Court · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.