Legal Opinion
Kasharian v. Wilentz
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 25, 1967PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
93 N.J. Super. 479 (1967)
226 A.2d 437
GEORGE KASHARIAN, ADMINIS. AD PROSEQUENDUM OF SARKES ANDREW KASHARIAN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DR. WILLIAM WILENTZ, ASSEMBLYMAN JOSEPH DOREN [sic], DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted October 27, 1966.
Decided January 25, 1967.
Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and LEONARD.
Mr. George Kasharian, administrator ad prosequendum, etc., pro se.
Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne, attorneys for defendant Wilentz (Mr. John I. Lisowski, of counsel).
2Per curiam
This is a motion by plaintiff, although inartistically styled…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Arkansas Bar Association v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- In Re Disbarment of George H. OtternessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Judd v. City Trust & Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- State Bar Assn. v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State ex rel. Noggle v. CrawfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Linda Beard v. James William BransonTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- Janiczek v. Dover Management Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones Y ValoresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- City of Downey v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Steele v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.