Legal Opinion
Mulready v. BOARD OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 29, 2009No. Docket: Ken-09-179PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.
[¶ 1] Robert J. Mulready appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Jabar, J.), affirming the decision of the Board of Real Estate Appraisers (BREA) (Bowditch, Acting Chairman) to issue a warning and order him to pay hearing costs pursuant to 10 M.R.S. §§ 8003(5-A)(A)(2), (B)(2), 1 8003- D 2 (2008). The BREA found that Mul-ready violated the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and Advisory Opinions’ (USPAP) Standards Rule 2 — 1(b) 3 and Ethics Rule on Conduct. 4 Because the two rules fall within the BREA’s realm of expertise and do not plainly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tolliver v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Seider v. Board of Examiners of PsychologistsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Lane Construction Corp. v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lorraine Scamman v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Rich v. DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCESSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Zumbach v. Board of Real Estate AppraisersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Lloyd v. Estate of RobbinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Lorraine Scamman v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.