Legal Opinion
Seider v. Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 29, 2000PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] Judith A. Seider appeals from the judgment of the Administrative Court (Wheeler; J.) affirming a decision and order of the Board of Examiners of Psychologists. Seider contends that the Board erred in numerous respects. Finding that the record contains substantial, competent evidence to support the conclusions of the Board, we affirm.
I. CASE HISTORY
[¶ 2] Seider is a clinical psychologist who was licensed to practice in the State of Maine. On February 25, 1992, a mother consulted with Seider about the possible sexual abuse of her then four-year-old son. A short time later, after one…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- New England Whitewater Center, Inc. v. Department of Inland Fisheries & WildlifeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Kezer v. Mark Stimson AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Aseptic Packaging Council v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Davric Maine Corp. v. Maine Harness Racing CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Downeast Energy Corp. v. Fund Insurance Review BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Uliano v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- William Clark v. Hancock County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Suzman v. Commissioner, Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- York Hospital v. Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Mulready v. BOARD OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERSSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.