Legal Opinion

Lorraine Scamman v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 7, 2017No. Docket: Fed-16-31PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphrey, J.

[¶ 1] Pursuant to 4 M.R.S. § 57 (2016), the United States District Court for the District of Maine has certified to us the following question of state law:

Is a claim for disparate impact age discrimination under the Maine Human Rights Act, 5 M.R.S.A. § 4572(1)(A), evaluated under the “reasonable factor other than age” standard, see Smith v. City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228, 125 S.Ct. 1536, 161 L.Ed.2d 410 (2005); the “business necessity” standard, see Maine Human Rights Comm’n v. City of Auburn, 408 A.2d 1253 (1979); or some other standard?

We answer the certified question as follows: “A claim…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Smith v. City of JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power LaboratorySupreme Court of the United States · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. NextEra Energy Resources, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  2. Euphrem Manirakiza v. Department of Health and Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  3. Erik Wuori v. Travis OtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  4. Mundell v. Acadia Hospital Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
  5. Thomas Franchini v. Investor's Business Daily, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API