Legal Opinion

State v. Kauffman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 1999No. 96-CR-2269; CA A99245PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for delivery of a controlled substance and driving under the influence, ORS 475.992 and ORS 813.010, that was entered after a stipulated facts trial. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from the search and seizure of a duffel bag. We affirm.

We state the facts as found by the trial court when supported by evidence, and, when findings are not made concerning facts that were in dispute, “we will presume that the facts were decided in a manner consistent with the ultimate conclusion * * *…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. BernaboCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. RayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API