Legal Opinion

State v. Price

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 26, 1997No. 96-3154PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

During a trial on drug charges, the trial judge announced that he would grant the defendant’s motion for mistrial because the state had adduced prejudicially improper evidence against him. At the instance of the prosecution, however, he agreed — to avoid a retrial if the defendant were acquitted — to submit the case to the jury. When the defendant was found guilty, the court entered a comprehensive and well-considered “order granting defendant’s ore tenus motion for mistrial” which stated:

The Defendant was charged by information with one count of Sale of Cocaine and one…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Carl FarnsworthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Hardie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. State v. CordiaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Day v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. TYEE MARTELE SPIKE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API