Legal Opinion
United States v. Carl Farnsworth
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 14, 1984No. 83-1671PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether the district court 1 abused its discretion or violated the defendant’s constitutional right to confrontation by allowing the defendant’s parole officers to identify him in surveillance photographs of a robbery. The district court had directed government counsel to instruct the parole officers not to indicate in any way that the defendant had a prior record. We affirm.
On December 10, 1982, two men entered the United Missouri Bank of Hickman Mills in Kansas City, Missouri, and robbed the tellers at gunpoint of over $14,600. One of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Edwin Thomas BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- John Michael Hughes v. Robert RainesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Gary Thomas ButcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- United States v. PaceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Barela Cruz, United States of America v. Rufino GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. JackmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.