Legal Opinion

Day v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 8, 2013No. 2D11-2110PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VILLANTI, Judge.

Latrice Day appeals her conviction for one count of grand theft ($300 or more), contending that the trial court erred by permitting the State to have a police officer identify Day as one of the women *1286depicted in surveillance video of the crime. While the identification testimony itself was admissible, we agree with Day that the trial court erred by permitting the State to elicit evidence of the witness’s status as a police officer. Therefore, we must reverse and remand for a new trial.

Day was charged with third-degree grand theft after several women entered a Walgreens, loaded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Carl FarnsworthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. Hardie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. State v. CordiaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Edwards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Patrick Albert Evans v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  2. TYEE MARTELE SPIKE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. Lucas v. Florida Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
  4. Patrick Albert Evans v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  5. Patrick Albert Evans v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API