Legal Opinion
MEDSTAR HEALTH, INC. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 15, 2016No. 14-AA-328PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERLY, Associate Judge:
This case requires us to interpret the health services planning statute, D.C. Code §§ 44-401 to -421 (2013 Repl.), which regulates the volume and distribution of health services in the District. The statute requires any entity seeking to offer a new health service in the District to first obtain a certificate of need from the Statewide Health Planning and Development Agency (SHPDA). The statute directs appeals of SHPDA’s certificate of need decisions to the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). But the nature of this appellate review is unclear. In this case, we…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Vizion One, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Health Care FinanceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- District of Columbia v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Stroman v. MayDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023