District of Columbia v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court by Associate Judge Thompson.
Dissenting opinion by Associate Judge Easterly at page 436. ,
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
This action arose when appellant District of Columbia (“the District”), asserting that it was acting “in its parens patriae capacity and through its Attorney General,” brought suit against defendant/appel-lee ExxonMobil Oil Corp. (“Exxon”) and defendants/appellees Anacostia Realty, LLC (“Anacostia”) and Springfield Petroleum Realty, LLC (“Springfield”) (affiliated entities sometimes hereafter referred to together as the “Distributors”), and Capitol Petroleum…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Corporate Accountability Lab v. Sambazon, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. PorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- Family Federation for World Peace and Unification International v. MoonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- Kalorama Citizens Ass'n v. SunTrust Bank, Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- Office of the People's Counsel v. D.C. Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.