Heikkinen v. Hansen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.
Prior to 1921, the Averill family owned a farm in Grays Harbor County. The Wynooche river crossed the northern portion of the land in such manner that they estimated approximately three acres were north of the river and thirty-nine acres south of it.
In 1921, the Averills conveyed to N. Gilkey that part of their farm lying north of the Wynooche river. The deed purported to describe the land by metes and bounds, together with these descriptive words: “containing that part of our farm North of the Wynooche River.” This deed contained only the north and east lines, and no south and west…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Hirt v. EntusWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Harper v. HolstonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Mertens v. MertensWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Kinnear v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Dickson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1970
- Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stafford AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Lakewood v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Lakewood v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.