Legal Opinion

Harper v. Holston

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1922No. 16657PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Taylor, J., entered January 10, 192.1, in favor of the defendants, in an action in ejectment, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— This is an action of ejectment, brought by the appellants Harper against the respondents, Holston and Woodall, to recover possession of a tract of land described as parts of lots two and three, in section twenty-eight, in township eleven, north of range twenty, east of the Willamette Meridian. The *437complaint was in the usual form in such cases. The answer put in issue the allegations of the complaint, and, as an affirmative defense, alleged that the land claimed hy the appellants was without the boundary lines of the lots named, and was unsurveyed, unappropriated, and unpatented land…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Puyallup Indian Tribe v. Port of TacomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Hirt v. EntusWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Omaha Indian Tribe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  4. Independent Stock Farm v. StevensNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Ghione v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API