Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stafford Associates

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1983No. 49362-6PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDimmick, J.

John Goodman signed a contract as president of a corporation "in formation." The narrow issue in the instant appeal is whether Goodman, as an individual, is a party to arbitration proceedings brought under the contract. The trial court held he was not. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court's conclusion. We affirm the Court of Appeals.

Goodman, a real estate salesman, sold an apartment building to Darden, Doman & Stafford Associates (hereafter DDS), a general partnership. The apartments needed extensive renovation and Goodman represented…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Johnson v. NasiWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Stap v. Chicago Aces Tennis Team, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. H. F. Philipsborn & Co. v. SusonIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Refrigeration Engineering Co. v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re Marriage of GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re the Marriage of MacDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Ikuno v. YipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API