Peabody v. Marlboro Implement Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
Appeals from judgments upon directed verdicts for the defendant in two related actions for damages for pei'sonal injuries arising from an automobile accident. The appellants are husband and wife and were plaintiffs below; their respective cases were consolidated for trial.
In the fust case, Mrs. Peabody sued the Marlboro Implement Company, a corporation, alleging that one Howard I. Beall, while acting as agent and employee of the defendant, did operate an automobile belonging to defendant upon the streets of the city of Washington, D. C., and then and there carelessly and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ritchie v. WallerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Callas v. Independent Taxi Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Fleischner v. DurginMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Riley v. RoachMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Tyler v. Stephan's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Rosenberg v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Forrester v. JermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Simon v. City Cab Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
- Simon v. DewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.