Legal Opinion
Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. The Tank Steamship Esso Camden
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 11, 1957No. 148, Docket 24265PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge.
Cross appeals are taken by two ships from damages awarded resulting from a collision in 1946 for which both ships were held to be at fault. The questions raised concern the measure of reimbursement to both ships for losses from their respective detentions and for the outlay by libellant of general average disbursements.
On November 2, 1946, the S. S. William S. Halsted collided with the tank steamship Esso Camden in Chesapeake Bay. The Halsted, owned by Moore-Mc-Cormack Lines, Inc., had just commenced a voyage to ports on the Baltic Sea. The Camden, owned by Standard Oil…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Williamson v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- The EuropeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
- The Gylfe v. The TrujilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Turecamo Maritime, Inc. v. Weeks Dredge No. 516District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. Esso CamdenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Compania Punta Alta, S.A. v. DalzellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Afran Transport Co. v. The Motor Tanker BergechiefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Lowery v. The Tug Ellen S. BouchardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1958