Legal Opinion
Compania Punta Alta, S.A. v. Dalzell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 28, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Respondents except to the report of Paul E. Lockwood, Esq., who was appointed, pursuant to an interlocutory decree of this court dated February 29, 1952, Commissioner to ascertain and compute damages.
The controversy arose out of a collision which occurred on December 11, 1946, between the S. S. Marjory, owned *928by Compañía Punta Alta, S. A., hereinafter libelant, and the S. S. Joseph E. Wing, a dead ship in tow of four tugs owned by Lloyd H. Dalzell, hereinafter respondent. The only physical damage resulting from the collision was that sustained by libelant, the live…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aktieselskabet Cuzco v. the SucarsecoSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- The North StarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Pan-American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- New Jersey Shipbuilding & Dredging Co. v. James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Pool Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Master Shipping Agency, Inc. v. M. S. FaridaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Master Shipping Agency, Inc. v. M. S. Farida, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc. And Norton Line, Third-Party Stockholms Rederi-Aktielbolag Svea, Third-Party v. Court Carpentry & Marine Contractors Co., and International Terminal Operating Co., Third-Party AndCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978