Afran Transport Co. v. The Motor Tanker Bergechief
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Libelant and claimant’s vessels were involved in a collision which has been adjudicated as one of mutual fault requiring the division of damages, although the fault of the libelant’s vessel was gross and that of claimant’s vessel less- clear. Afran Transport Co. v. The Bergechief, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 170 F.Supp. 893, affirmed 2 Cir., 274 F.2d 469. Libelant’s vessel sustained the greater damage, so that on the stipulated amounts a balance was due libelant of $69,203. It therefore sought interest to run prior to the final decree,1 but Judge Dimock declined to award any interest prior to its entry,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Afran Transport Co. v. The BergechiefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Canadian Aviator, Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Afran Transport Co. v. The Motor Tanker BergechiefDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. The Tank Steamship Esso CamdenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
3Cited by1 opinion
- Afran Transport Co., as Owner of the S.S. Burgan, Etc., Libelant-Appellant v. The Motor Tanker Bergechief, A/s Sneffon, Claimant-Appellee. A/s Sneffon, as Owner of the Motor Tanker Bergechief, Cross-Libelant-Appellee v. The S.S. Burgan and Afran Transport Co., Cross-Claimant-Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960