Legal Opinion

Afran Transport Co. v. The Motor Tanker Bergechief

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 28, 1960No. Nos. 86, 87, Dockets 26373, 26374PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Libelant and claimant’s vessels were involved in a collision which has been adjudicated as one of mutual fault requiring the division of damages, although the fault of the libelant’s vessel was gross and that of claimant’s vessel less- clear. Afran Transport Co. v. The Bergechief, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 170 F.Supp. 893, affirmed 2 Cir., 274 F.2d 469. Libelant’s vessel sustained the greater damage, so that on the stipulated amounts a balance was due libelant of $69,203. It therefore sought interest to run prior to the final decree,1 but Judge Dimock declined to award any interest prior to its entry,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Afran Transport Co. v. The BergechiefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. Canadian Aviator, Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  4. Afran Transport Co. v. The Motor Tanker BergechiefDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  5. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. The Tank Steamship Esso CamdenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Afran Transport Co., as Owner of the S.S. Burgan, Etc., Libelant-Appellant v. The Motor Tanker Bergechief, A/s Sneffon, Claimant-Appellee. A/s Sneffon, as Owner of the Motor Tanker Bergechief, Cross-Libelant-Appellee v. The S.S. Burgan and Afran Transport Co., Cross-Claimant-Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API