Legal Opinion
Krichbaum v. Kelley
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided February 9, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-103-HPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MICHAEL, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, and upon the federal defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Other motions will be resolved by separate order. For the reasons that follow, the court finds that summary judgment in favor of the defendants is appropriate, and therefore will deny plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction as moot.
I
Plaintiff Steven Krichbaum, pro se, commenced this action on December 14, 1993, 1 seeking judicial review of actions undertaken by the United States Forest Service and George W.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MaritaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Sierra Club v. Mike Espy, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Sierra Club v. MaritaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Piedmont Environmental Council v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
- North Carolina Alliance for Transportation Reform, Inc. v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.