Legal Opinion
Salzman v. Bachrach
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 20, 2000No. 99SC166PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis
We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision in Bachrach v. Salzman, 981 P.2d 219 (Colo.App.1999). 1 We conclude that the Respondent, Erwin Bachrach, established a claim of unjust enrichment and is entitled to restitution of at least some of his contributions to the residence titled in the name of Petitioner Roberta F. Salzman. Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals and remand this case to the trial court for a determination of the amount of restitution based upon the principles set out in this opinion.
I
Bachrach and Salzman met in 1986 when Salzman, a divorcee,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- DCB Construction Co. v. Central City Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Hewitt v. HewittIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Collins v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Cablevision of Breckenridge, Inc. v. Tannhauser Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Grynberg v. Total S.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Interbank Investments, LLC v. Eagle River Water & Sanitation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.