Legal Opinion

State v. Munday Enterprises

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1994No. D-2296PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

This case arises out of the condemnation of part of a commercial tract in order to widen and convert U.S. Highway 183 into an elevated controJled-access highway. The issue here concerns not the value of the part taken, but the compensation recoverable for damages to the remainder. In State v. Schmidt, 867 S.W.2d 769 (Tex.1993), we held that landowners are not as a rule entitled to compensation for a decrease in value of the remainder due to the diversion of traffic, increased circuity of travel, lessened visibility, and interim construction inconvenience. Because the judgment here is based in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. Munday EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Interstate Northborough Partnership v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. County of Bexar v. SantikosTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. MoruaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. Northborough Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  5. Precast Structures, Inc. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API