Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Daniels

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1960No. A-7315PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenhill

Sarah Daniels brought this suit against the city alleging that she was injured when she slipped and fell on some wet paint in the street. The paint had been freshly put down by city employees to indicate the area for the parking of cars adjacent to the curb and a parking meter. The trial court entered judgment for Sarah Daniels based upon the jury’s verdict. That judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 322 S.W. 2d 384. We here affirm the judgments below.

The areas set aside for parking of automobiles were designated by painted lines. The lines had become worn. Under the direction…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. City of Galveston v. PosnainskyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. City of Houston v. ShillingTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. City of Austin v. SchmedesTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. City of Port Arthur v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. City Council of Augusta v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. City of LaPorte v. BarfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. City of Gladewater v. PikeTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Aero Energy, Inc. v. Circle C Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dillard v. Austin Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Herschbach v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API