Legal Opinion

Gold Kist, Inc. v. Hood

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 9, 1999No. 2980104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

773 So.2d 1031 (1999)

GOLD KIST, INC.

v.

Ronald Joe HOOD.

2980104.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 9, 1999.

Rehearing Denied September 10, 1999.

Robert P. Fann and Michael B. Odom of Fann & Rea, P.C., Birmingham, for appellant.

G. Whit Drake and Rex W. Slate of Drake & Associates, Birmingham, for appellee.

2Per curiam

Ronald Joe Hood filed an action against Gold Kist, Inc., pursuant to § 25-5-11.1, Ala.Code 1975, alleging that, in retaliation for his filing a workers' compensation claim, Gold Kist had terminated his employment. After a trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Hood, awarding him…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited26 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flint Constr. Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. AutoZone, Inc. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Mercy Medical v. GrayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. Flint Constr. Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API