Legal Opinion

Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 1988No. 86-1503, 86-1554PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves the interpretation of the retaliatory termination section of Alabama's Workman's Compensation Act, Ala. Code 1975 § 25-5-11.1, which provides in pertinent part as follows:

"No employee shall be terminated by an employer solely because the employee has instituted or maintained any action against the employer to recover worker's compensation benefits under this chapter. . . ."

On November 7, 1984, Marvin Twilley sustained an injury to his back while working for Daubert Coated Products, Inc. He filed a claim for worker's compensation benefits, and he received total temporary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Doe v. New York UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. Smith v. Piezo Technology & Prof. Adm'rsSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Pushkin v. Regents of the University of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  5. Clifford v. Cactus Drilling Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Culbreth v. Woodham Plumbing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Motion Industries, Inc. v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Continental Eagle Corp. v. MokrzyckiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Powell v. WYOMING CABLEVISION. INC.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API