Legal Opinion

AutoZone, Inc. v. Leonard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 2001No. 1991293 and 1991301PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

812 So.2d 1179 (2001)

AutoZONE, INC.

v.

Michael LEONARD.

Michael Leonard

v.

AutoZone, Inc.

1991293 and 1991301.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 27, 2001.

Rehearing Applications Denied July 13, 2001.

Jonathan S. Harbuck of Kullman Firm, P.C., Birmingham, for appellant/cross appellee AutoZone, Inc.

Nat Bryan, Dennis E. Goldasich, Jr., and Thomas M. Powell of Marsh, Rickard & Bryan, P.C., Birmingham, for appellee/cross appellant Michael Leonard.

2Per curiam

The defendant AutoZone, Inc., appeals from a judgment awarding compensatory and punitive damages in a wrongful-termination case. The plaintiff Michael Leonard…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT ASS'N v. GrissettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Motion Industries, Inc. v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shiv-Ram, Inc. v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Ross v. Rosen-RagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Line v. VenturaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. CNH America, LLC v. Ligon Capital, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  5. Ala. River Grp., Inc. v. Conecuh Timber, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API