Ingalls Iron Works Co. v. Fehlhaber Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES T. FOLEY, Chief Judge.
Memorandum-Decision and Order
As the title might warn, claims that create complexity are set forth in this action. The motion at hand has resulted in a massive submission. The briefing by plaintiff was withheld for several months and then when filed was most extensive in its coverage followed by a tit-for-tat prolonging of the final submission by letters and supplemental affidavits by both sides for a substantial time period.
Generally, the motion by the named defendants can be described as one for summary relief of dismissal of each of the three claims, or in the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- The Union Insurance Society of Canton, Ltd. v. William Gluckin & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ingalls Iron Works Company v. Fehlhaber CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Morgold, Inc. v. KeelerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995