Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. E. J. Lavino & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1942No. Appeals, 7 and 85PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

These appeals require a construction of the Occupational Disease Compensation Act of July 2, 1937, P. L. 2714.

David McIntyre entered the employ of defendant, E. J. Lavino & Co. in December, 1933. From 1935 on his duties consisted of operating a mill for drying manganese ore, an occupation which involved exposure to manganese dust, but in September, 1937, he was transferred to defendant’s chrome department and thereafter had no contact with .manganese. He was discharged on the fourth of February, 1938. On the twelfth of that month he began to complain of pains in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Plazak v. Allegheny Steel CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Moffett v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Polk v. Western Bedding Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Frisbie v. Sunshine Mining CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Agostin v. Pittsburgh Steel Foundry Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Bible v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API