Legal Opinion
United States v. Ullmann
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 9, 2015No. 14-3148PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
We must decide the lawfulness of a condition of supervised release that imposes “restrictions and/or prohibitions related to: computer and Internet use.” We conclude that this language, standing alone, would impermissibly impose a greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary because it suggests the Probation Office may completely ban a means of communication that has become a necessary component of modern life. No extraordinary circumstances justify such a blanket ban in this case. This conflicts with our holding in United States v. White, 244 F.3d 1199, 1206…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Delbert R. HolmCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Larry PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. MikeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Perazza-MercadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Russell Lane WalserCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. CabralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Marysa ComerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. HullCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.