Legal Opinion
United States v. Hull
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 26, 2018No. 17-1086PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
*1223 I. Introduction
Defendant-Appellant Keith Howard Hull challenges one of the conditions of supervised release imposed by the district court when it sentenced him for committing bank robbery. The condition requires him to notify third parties of risks he may pose to them. According to Hull, the condition is unconstitutionally vague, an unconstitutional delegation of judicial authority, and an unlawful occupational restriction. Exercising jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , we affirm Hull's sentence.
II. Background
Hull was charged by indictment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MikeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. CorrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. SouserCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. LlantadaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. CabralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Gerald Lynn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. Sa 10092-11581 v. Waveblast Watersports, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Kison RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.