United States v. Blair
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to decide whether a special condition of supervised release that states that the "defendant's use of computers and Internet access devices must be limited to those the defendant requests to use, and which the probation officer authorizes," R. Vol. I at 97, involves a "greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary for" deterring criminal activity, protecting the public, and promoting a defendant's rehabilitation in contravention of 18 U.S.C. §§ 3583 (d)(2) and 3553(a)(2)(B)-(D). We conclude that this special condition violates these…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MikeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Russell Lane WalserCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Planned Parenthood of Kan. v. AndersenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. WareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. McCraryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Biggs v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.