Legal Opinion
United States v. Russell Lane Walser
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 28, 2001No. 01-8019PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Russell Lane Walser appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence garnered in two searches of his personal computer. He also appeals the district court’s imposition of a special condition of supervised release that prohibits him from using the Internet without prior permission from the United States Probation Office. For the reasons set out below, we affirm.
I
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, as we must, see United States v. Simpson, 152 F.3d 1241, 1246 (10th Cir.1998), the record reflects the following. On June…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Leigh Raymond TamuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Anthony Ray Jefferson and Roosevelt Jefferson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. J. Clenton Henson (87-5132) Sheila Henson Lutz (87-5138) & C. Alan Henson (87-5144)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Teresa Mechell GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Charley HargusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. KimlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Chance ReardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. MagallanezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. StabileCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.