Legal Opinion

Mason v. Crawford

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1936No. Civ. 5668PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This cause is before us upon an appeal by the defendant from the order of the superior court granting the plaintiff a new trial. The cause of action arises out of a collision alleged to have been caused by double parking, near the intersection of Tenth and H Streets in the city of Modesto, county of Stanislaus.

The record shows that on or about March 1, 1935, at approximately 8 P. M., the defendant, accompanied by his wife, stopped an automobile on the roadward side of parked automobiles in the city of Modesto; that the plaintiff was riding as a guest in a ear driven by one Gerald Mashek,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moss v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Fleming v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. McMillan v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Flynn v. Bledsoe Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Keiper v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Fennessey v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Thomson v. BaylessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Arthur v. Santa Monica Dairy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API