Legal Opinion

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Barron

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1999No. 98-2215PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Practicing law while under suspension for failure to meet continuing legal education requirements and pay the imposed fine warranted indefinite suspension in Toledo Bar Assn. v. Christensen (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 71, *168671 N.E.2d 30, and such a sanction is also warranted in this case. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice- of law in Ohio and remains subject to the conditions of our order of June 18, 1993. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. ChristensenOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. HigginsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. CrandallOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. EislerOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. SeabrookOhio Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API