Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 2010No. 2010-0346PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Henry Roosevelt Freeman of Tallmadge, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0022713, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1981. On August 13, 2008, this court imposed a one-year suspension with six months stayed on conditions based upon respondent’s failure to maintain proper accounting of client funds and his improper use of trust accounts as personal checking accounts. Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman, 119 Ohio St.3d 330, 2008-Ohio-3836, 894 N.E.2d 31.

{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline now recommends that we indefinitely suspend respondent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KouryOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. HigginsOhio Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Assn. v. SqueoOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. Sarver (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. EislerOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Ford (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API